On 03/05/10 06:06, Invisible wrote:
> I just read a PhD thesis where somebody wrote an LLVM back-end for the
> Haskell compiler. The "conclusions" section is entertaining. Consider this:
> 

> current complete uselessness is surprising. In closing, I believe that
> LLVM offers a compelling and viable back-end target for GHC today."
> 
> Obviously I'm taking this out of context. But seriously... it's useless,
> and that makes it a compelling and viable back-end? I LOL'd.

	Ponder over how useful Haskell is, and you'll have your answer.<G>

-- 
How many of you believe in telekinesis?  Raise MY hand!

Post a reply to this message