Warp wrote:
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> If you can't estimate progress in a meaningful way, don't pretend that 
>> you can. ;-)
> 
>   What I ended up doing instead was to show the current search path as
> lines of changing colors over the puzzle, updating a few times per second.
> Doesn't tell you much about the progress, but shows clearly that the
> program is doing something.

Right. And IMHO, that would be a correct solution. It makes it clear 
that something is happening, without giving the user inaccurate progress 
indications.

Post a reply to this message