Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> Let's ask this: Why doesn't C++ have encapsulation?
> 
>   Clearly we have a different definition of "encapsulation".

I explained why encapsulation is important and why unsafe languages don't 
have it.  What's your definition of encapsulation, and why does it make a 
difference to the programming productivity?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   The question in today's corporate environment is not
   so much "what color is your parachute?" as it is
   "what color is your nose?"

Post a reply to this message