|
|
On 2/27/2010 10:01 AM, Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>> Neeum Zawan <m.n### [at] ieeeorg> wrote:
>>> I think you're assuming that the ban will be sudden. Make it happen
>>> slowly (over, say, 2 decades), and the outcome may be quite muted.
>>
>> I don't think it's possible to repeal an amendment over the span of
>> 2 decades. It's instantaneous: At one moment the amendment is valid,
>> the next moment it has been repealed. I don't think there's any middle
>> ground there.
>>
>> It happened with the 18th (in December 5th 1933, to be exact).
>
> I think Neeum meant a slow ban on guns in spite of constitutional
> protections. For example, it's now very difficult to own machine guns,
> in spite of the 2nd amendment not giving them special treatment.
>
You might be surprised, but even the NRA, for the most part, *agrees*
with the idea that there is a sane point, beyond which you need to be an
idiot to think someone should own one. And, I have, personally, no
problem with people having such things "at firing ranges". Somewhat less
so when its, well... for example, a racist, right wing, borderline white
supremacist, evangelical preacher, found dead in his closet with a dozen
of them, wearing multiple wetsuits, and his neck squeezed shut by
several of his own ties. (And that isn't to mention the disturbing thing
in a certain region of his anatomy *under* the wet suits.)
As much as I distrust, and am made uneasy by, the idea that, "Everyone
would be safer if it was like the wild west, and everyone had a shot
gun!", mentality, its nice to know even the gun advocates (well, most of
them) have some point where they say, "Ok.. Maybe there is a point that
goes a hair too far here."
--
void main () {
If Schrödingers_cat is alive or version > 98 {
if version = "Vista" {
call slow_by_half();
call DRM_everything();
}
call functional_code();
}
else
call crash_windows();
}
<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>
Post a reply to this message
|
|