Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Oh.. And they are always willing to a) assert that their are "a lot" of 
> cases where is improved the odds of people not dying, while b) their 
> only evidence is situations that involved guns, and where there was no 
> way to resolve the situation without more of them.

Not really. If you look at, for example, the FBI unified crime stats, you 
see that having a gun is somewhat safer than doing whatever the attacker 
says, which is in turn somewhat safer than anything else.

It's not like there isn't any scientific evidence.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message