Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I think this is just a case of a flawed proof though. I'm pretty sure
> the *result* is correct.
He's trying to prove that *his* CA is turing complete. I already know there
are lots of turing complete CAs. I'm not sure what "result" you think is
correct?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|