Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> I think this is just a case of a flawed proof though. I'm pretty sure 
> the *result* is correct.

He's trying to prove that *his* CA is turing complete. I already know there 
are lots of turing complete CAs.  I'm not sure what "result" you think is 
correct?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message