>>> You can compute this quite easily in Haskell:
>>
>> ...and yet, an exhaustive analysis of the data quickly demonstrates 
>> that Andrel was correct in the first place:
>>
>> Pr(X > Y) = 2/100
>> Pr(X = Y) = 1/100
>> Pr(X < Y) = 0/100
>>
> 
> exhaustive analysis? What exhaustive analysis?

Reading the entire dataset by hand - the brute-force approach. ;-)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message