Neeum Zawan wrote:
> I can see it either way. On one level, it could have been a "harmless
> accident" (who's supposed to guess that something like reading
> comprehension would become such a big issue?). On the other hand, I can
> also see it as "We know these guys suck at reading comprehension. Let's
> make it a big part of the test, and set the time constraints in a manner
> such that they're much more likely to fail."

But saying "black people suck at reading comprehension, so we should dumb 
the test down by asking for less reading" would also be discrimination.

Post a reply to this message