POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.scene-files : f_mandelbulb.010.zip : Re: f_mandelbulb.020.zip Server Time
18 May 2024 14:02:14 EDT (-0400)
  Re: f_mandelbulb.020.zip  
From: waggy
Date: 6 Feb 2010 10:50:56
Message: <4b6d8fe0$1@news.povray.org>
Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
> On 06.02.10 07:40, waggy wrote:
>> I'm guessing the extra switching cost is more than offset by keeping
>> the floating-point pipelines full.
> 
> Your guess is wrong as long as you counted "cores" as the logical number 
> of cores seen by the operating system - including simultaneous 
> multi-threading capabilities your processor may have.
> 
I'm counting the eight physical cores in the two quad-core AMD 2344 HE 
sockets F on the motherboard.

> What you are most likely seeing is that your OS gives your application 
> slightly higher priority as a whole if it is running more threads, 
> either because it is designed to detect compute-heavy applications or 
> because its internal scheduling is on a thread rather than process basis.
> 
Interesting.  This is a on recent install of Ubuntu 9.10 Server Edition 
with their "server" kernel.  I'll do some better timing tests after I 
set up another one of these boards headless.

~David


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.