Invisible wrote:
> proof by reduction to the wrong problem:

I liked one that we got in a class on parallel processing. Prof writes up an 
algorithm that doesn't have any loops (since it's done in parallel). He says 
"This is order one.  Proof by ... well, proof by inspection.  Look at it!"

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message