|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
nemesis wrote:
> Haskell is not better, just different.
Right. So the huge list of "Haskell does X automatically but Ocaml makes
you do it by hand" doesn't count as "better", just "different"?
> Curried functions?
> Hindley-Milner type system? Yeah, all coming from ML. You could say OCaml is
> ML++. :)
It even has "ML" right there in the name.
> Haskell is Junior, ML is Senior, capisce? ;)
Well, I've never seen ML, so I couldn't say if it's better or worse. But
Oaml seems to lack so many useful things...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |