nemesis wrote:

> Haskell is not better, just different.

Right. So the huge list of "Haskell does X automatically but Ocaml makes 
you do it by hand" doesn't count as "better", just "different"?

> Curried functions?
> Hindley-Milner type system?  Yeah, all coming from ML.  You could say OCaml is
> ML++. :)

It even has "ML" right there in the name.

> Haskell is Junior, ML is Senior, capisce? ;)

Well, I've never seen ML, so I couldn't say if it's better or worse. But 
Oaml seems to lack so many useful things...

Post a reply to this message