Warp wrote:
> Apparently their concept of "free" doesn't extend to people
> developing "non-free" software.

You hadn't already figured that out? :-) If they wanted free software to be 
usable by commercial developers, they wouldn't have made the GPL. They would 
have stuck with really-free software.

That said, I'm surprised they're willing to give you legal advice for that 
little, let alone without paying them at all.  I wonder how it would be 
delivered: From a lawyer? If so, that's cheap for advice coming from the 
lawyers of the only people who would be interested in suing you. If not, 
then it sounds like they may very well be "practicing law without a license."

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message