Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> > Darren New wrote:
> > 
> >> Wouldn't most any POSIX-compliant OS fit this definition?
> > 
> > Doesn't Windows pretend to be partially POSIX-compliant?

> That was my next question, yes. ;-)

  Partially POSIX-compliant is not the same as fully POSIX-compliant.
POSIX doesn't define only system calls.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message