Warp wrote:
>   You can't talk about discrimination if the different passing rates are
> not caused purposefully.

If there were questions that unfairly penalized one sub-culture over another 
for no good reason, and it was brought to the attention of those in charge, 
and they didn't correct it, then that too could be discrimination. That's 
what the article is saying happened.

I don't think anyone wrote the test intentionally trying to keep minorities 
out of the job.  (You never know, tho.)

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message