Neeum Zawan wrote:
> Will everyone know that a deck of cards has 52 of them?

54.

> 	I'm willing to accept that the test was discriminatory - I just want to
> know how. My complaint isn't about the ruling, but the journalism
> (something everyone who responded seemed to miss).

I caught it. We were discussing whether the reason the test's discriminatory 
nature wasn't disclosed is because nobody can figure out why it's 
discriminatory.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
   I get "focus follows gaze"?

Post a reply to this message