|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> OTOH, how many examples are there where the jury has convicted the
> defendant because of prejudice rather than neutral objectivity,
That certainly happens too. It's not like judges and cops aren't prejudiced
too, tho.
Sometimes a hearing will be moved to a different town because the prejudice
around the case is too high. I'm not sure you could get away with accusing a
judge of that.
> I guess that those cases don't often end up in Washington Post...
As I said, it isn't necessarily the best way of working things. This just
gives you the reason people are in *favor* of it. I didn't say that
overwhelms the reasons it's bad.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |