On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:53:42 -0800, Darren New wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:>> of L/R moves in each iteration,> > which also fails because the other robot will move in sync. :-)
I had thought about introducing a "skip next change in direction" if the
parachute was found - I think that would put it on an alternating course,
but you're right, otherwise it would be perfectly synchronized. :-)
Jim
