Tim Cook wrote:
> Speaking of Unobtanium, the other day I came across this article,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Element_115 ...'ununpentium'.  Using the
> naming scheme that they are for elements that haven't been assigned a
> 'proper' name yet will clearly lead to one thing and one thing only:
> eventually, we will create unobtanium.

What element number would that be?

115 is ununpentium because 'un' = 1 and 'pent' = 5.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_element_name

Post a reply to this message