|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> - I have ADSL. That stands for ASYMMETRIC Digital Subscriber Line. In
> laymen's terms, by download rate is about 5x faster than my upload rate.
> I can download at the speedy rate of around 310 KB/sec, but I can only
> *upload* at a maximum of about 46 KB/sec.
>
> - This means that it is physically impossible for me to upload
> particularly fast. That should hypothetically result in low download
> speeds.
>
> - As it happens, seeders by definition don't download anything. So they
> can't upload to others based on how fast they download form them. They
> therefore upload to the fastest clients. So I still get a nice download
> rate.
>
> - But wait! This torrent has 450 seeders and 3 downloaders. And I
> sometimes see 200 KB/sec from a single seeder, so... why THE HELL is any
> peer going to download from me at a piffling 40 KB/sec when there are
> peers out there at least 5x faster?
The wikipedia article mentions some aspects of BT that specifically take
this into account.
> - The whole share rating thing is a bit short-signed too. If I upload
> 10MB to a 100MB torrent, I get a 10% rating. If I upload 100MB to a
> 1,000MB torrent... I get a 10% rating. In one case I've helped way, way
> more, but I still get the same rating.
But in all technicality, you've helped exactly the same, relative to the
whole torrent. Which is the only relevant measure.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |