|
|
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>> I hate to say this, but Java was *designed* for embedded programming.
>
> I wonder about their design choices given that it was intended originally
> for *embedded*
I think the idea was that they were targeting two primary things:
1) Portability, so you didn't have to rewrite your EPG-download code over
again every time you released a new cable modem in your set-top box, and
2) Reliability, because when you have 100,000 customers, a crash for 1% of
them once a month is a fatal problem.
I would imagine stuff like codecs would still be native code. It's the stuff
like user interfaces and interfacing to the provisioning systems you'd want
to be portable.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|