|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
NO SPOILERS IN THIS MESSAGE
Captain Jack wrote:
> I don't know if the current spate of 3D in cinema is going to be a fad
Only after 3D blu-ray is available. Right now, it's big because it's the
only way to see a 3D movie.
> I do wish there was some way to create a screen made up of semi-transparent
> layers (or something) so that 3D films could be done without the glasses,
> though.
There is. You just have to hold your head really still. It's more a monitor
than a TV, in that sense.
There's also apparently work on a 3D TV using jitter-3D like
(link has a naked butt in one of the images, so NSFW maybe)
http://www.well.com/~jimg/stereo/stereo_list.html
to make for 3D you can view from wide angles. Apparently if you do it at
just the right speed, you can't see the wiggle.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |