|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Darren New" <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote in message
news:4b4f5ac8$1@news.povray.org...
> I don't mind simple, but cliche got to me. I'm sure you can think of
> several other well-known stories with essentially identical plots. :-)
Well.. one or two, yeah. :-)
> Agreed. I almost never see a long movie without looking at my watch, but
> I'll admit there have been a handful like that. Indeed, I think that might
> be one of the reasons Transformers2 was so enjoyable while still being
> utterly stupid at the same time. :-)
I really liked Transformers 2, although most of the time I couldn't tell
whether it was the good guys or the bad guys getting blown up. The juvenile
humor was a nice touch, too; as though they were saying, "Yes, we know
exactly what kind of movie we are."
> It's definitely a keeper. I'm hoping they actually filmed the scenes they
> cut[1] and plan to include them in the DVDs. I also expect this will be
> one of the first 3D movies available on 3D disk players when such are
> invented.
I know a guy who is already planning to get a 3D TV as soon as he gets a
chance, in the hopes that he'll be able to get a Blu-Ray (or some
equivalent) of this movie whenever it becomes available.
I don't know if the current spate of 3D in cinema is going to be a fad or
not, but I think this movie did a really good job of showing how it can add
to the performance without being an in-your-face gimmick (well, mostly...).
I do wish there was some way to create a screen made up of semi-transparent
layers (or something) so that 3D films could be done without the glasses,
though.
--
Jack
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |