POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Difference in height_fields between beta 35 and previous betas or 3.6 : Re: Difference in height_fields between beta 35 and previous betas or 3.6 Server Time
4 Jul 2024 13:31:16 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Difference in height_fields between beta 35 and previous betas or 3.6  
From: Thomas de Groot
Date: 14 Jan 2010 08:01:02
Message: <4b4f158e$1@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> schreef in bericht 
news:web.4b4f114bbfa4a9765f302820@news.povray.org...
> I'm curious if the same thing happens when using an image_map (for the 
> function)
> that doesn't have an embedded gamma. I.e., JPEG or TIFF (or BMP on a 
> Windows
> platform.) If such an image *does* work correctly, then at least part of 
> the
> problem would be with 'embedded' gamma and how beta 35 handles it.
>

The answer is yes. With a JPEG image called by the function, the discrepancy 
happens too. Again, this can be corrected by adding file_gamma 1.0

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.