|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Kevin Wampler wrote:
> That said, I'm not sure it's necessary to actually understand the proper
> definition of distance in order to talk about circles in other spaces --
> particularly if we limit ourselves to spherical and hyperbolic spaces
> which are more or less easy to visualize.
Actually, I was thinking of actual real space, where the same distances are
different depending who is measuring them. What's a circle for me isn't a
circle for you, so I find it hard to imagine a good definition for "pi"
under such circumstances.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Forget "focus follows mouse." When do
I get "focus follows gaze"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |