>> That's why I think even AWS isn't REST.
> 
> Sometimes I wish REST was a registered trademark (with a royalty-free 
> license to use it), so that Roy Fielding could sue people who call their 
> protocols 'REST' when they're not :)

 From what I could tell from Wikipedia, "REST" isn't even a specific 
mechanism. It's a vague design style. It looks like you could claim that 
almost *anything* is REST...

Post a reply to this message