|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
andrel wrote:
> Wikipedia does not seem to support your view of what a
> socialist economics is, but that is just one source.
There are lots of definitions, since enforcing economics is part of
government, so the two get confused a lot. I usually look at multiple
definitions for words like that. Try googling "define:socialism"
> The US does not have or had a socialist party that plays any significant
> role.
It depends on what you mean by "socialist party". It's true we wind up with
only two parties primarily represented, but the policies of those two
parties change over time.
> So I don't think an American can comment on what socialism is or
> should be, at least not when Europeans are present ;)
I'm not. On the other hand, I don't think you can pick one definition and
say it's the "right" definition, either.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |