Warp wrote:

>   Could it be that, somewhat ironically, when a movie is CGI-only, the
> creators can and do concentrate more on the story itself because they
> don't have to be showing off photorealistic CGI (which in a CGI-only
> movie is actually more counter-productive than useful)? Maybe the mentality
> is more like "CG all in itself does not make a 90-minute movie, so we also
> need a story to support it".

Seems plausible to me...

Post a reply to this message