Warp wrote:

>   What personally bothers me about lazy texturing is, as I already said,
> that it gives a rather poor perception of how good of a renderer POV-Ray
> really is. If the images look like they were created in 1995, it doesn't
> give a very good impression of the program.
> 

That is one possible perception, obviously, since you took it that way. 
  But not the only one.  Another might see it as a very approachable 
program for amateur use, and be drawn to it.

I think the texturing was so understated that it can only be taken as a 
sort of placeholder.

Post a reply to this message