|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmail com> wrote in message
news:op.u493g4klufxv4h@xena...
>I saw Avatar on IMAX this weekend. It definitely was the most beautiful
>and realistic computer graphics I've ever seen! It was a choice between
>IMAX and 3d. Since 3d hurts my eyes and I've never been in an IMAX theatre
>before, I went for IMAX.
>
> Anybody seen it in 3d yet?
I've just seen it in 3D... I would have chosen 2D, but they only showed it
in 3D...
At the beginning, they showed an introduction explaining 3D-cinema, telling
us that technology has advanced to the point where they can give us
3D-cinema without any loss in image quality, yet during the movie I was
wondering why, if they really have that kind of technology, they didn't use
it... this *certainly* was not the same image quality as a normal movie:
brightness and contrast didn't even come close to that :(
All lies, I tell ya!
As for the movie itself: stunning visual effects, extremely predictable
'story', lousy acting.
cu!
--
#macro G(b,e)b+(e-b)*C/50#end#macro _(b,e,k,l)#local C=0;#while(C<50)
sphere{G(b,e)+3*z.1pigment{rgb G(k,l)}finish{ambient 1}}#local C=C+1;
#end#end _(y-x,y,x,x+y)_(y,-x-y,x+y,y)_(-x-y,-y,y,y+z)_(-y,y,y+z,x+y)
_(0x+y.5+y/2x)_(0x-y.5+y/2x) // ZK http://www.povplace.com
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |