Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >> The Matrix is just the prison where they put the humans. If Smith takes 
> >> over that prison... so what? Why would the Architect care?
> > 
> >   They built the enormous life simulator, and it's about to get destroyed,
> > and the billions of humans with it. Why would the Architect care?
> > 
> >   The Matrix exists for a reason, and it's about to get destroyed.

> Ah, well, if Smith is actually going to *destroy* the Matrix rather than 
> just take control of it... yes, that would be bad.

  You mean:

 The Architect: "Ah, he is only going to take control of it, not destroy it?
Well, then it's all ok, I should just relax and not worry about a thing."

  And that would make sense to you?

> >>>> Seriously, it looks like "OMG, this film was so popular! We MUST make a
> >>>> sequal! Hey, why not make it a trilogy?"
> >>> Except that isn't how it happened; they planned to do 3 from the start, 
> >>> AFAICR.
> > 
> >> Yeah, that's puzzling.
> > 
> >   It's puzzling that they wanted to make a trilogy?

> No, it's puzzling that there's such a big variation in quality.

  I see no variation in quality.

  Or is your definition of "quality" whether you understand the plot or not?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message