|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible escreveu:
>>> Yes, because crude approximations to cylindrical columns look so much
>>> more photo-realistic than actually cylindrical columns. Oh, wait...
>>
>> Consider what happens if your "approximation" results in
>> sub-pixel-sized triangles. Then it becomes no more an approximation
>> than yours does, considering *your* picture is also made out of pixels.
>
> ...until you have a reflection of the object where the triangles appear
> bigger. Or a shadow cast in the wrong direction.
>
> But yeah, sure, I am apparently the only person here who thinks that
> real curves are superior to faked ones. I'll grant you that one.
I grant you don't know what an integral means. I'm also aware that you
long lost reasoning in your will to spill poison. I also notice you are
not listening to us in your lone quest...
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |