Invisible escreveu:
>>> Yes, because crude approximations to cylindrical columns look so much 
>>> more photo-realistic than actually cylindrical columns. Oh, wait...
>>
>> Consider what happens if your "approximation" results in 
>> sub-pixel-sized triangles. Then it becomes no more an approximation 
>> than yours does, considering *your* picture is also made out of pixels.
> 
> ...until you have a reflection of the object where the triangles appear 
> bigger. Or a shadow cast in the wrong direction.
> 
> But yeah, sure, I am apparently the only person here who thinks that 
> real curves are superior to faked ones. I'll grant you that one.

I grant you don't know what an integral means.  I'm also aware that you 
long lost reasoning in your will to spill poison.  I also notice you are 
not listening to us in your lone quest...

-- 
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9

Post a reply to this message