|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> Yes, because crude approximations to cylindrical columns look so much
> more photo-realistic than actually cylindrical columns. Oh, wait...
Consider what happens if your "approximation" results in sub-pixel-sized
triangles. Then it becomes no more an approximation than yours does,
considering *your* picture is also made out of pixels.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |