PM 2Ring wrote:
> but no radiosity: it was just too slow. This render took over 7 days on my
> 480MHz machine. I was hoping for a more impressive looking result, after all
> that render time. Oh well.

I haven't used any raytracing software for years, but am wondering how 
much do the modern machines change the rendering times with something 
like this? for instance, i am currently using a quad-core 2.00 ghz 
machine with lots of ram. obviously, the quad-core would be faster, but 
by how much?

zutroi

Post a reply to this message