Neeum Zawan wrote:
>     Having engaged in the peer review process, I don't have too strong 
> belief in its effectiveness. I haven't really thought of an alternative, 
> though.

I think it's effective for ruling out the obviously-flawed experiments. 
Combine that with the requirement for repeatability and you get science. The 
repeatability is where the parapsychology falls down.


-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message