|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Neeum Zawan wrote:
> Having engaged in the peer review process, I don't have too strong
> belief in its effectiveness. I haven't really thought of an alternative,
> though.
I think it's effective for ruling out the obviously-flawed experiments.
Combine that with the requirement for repeatability and you get science. The
repeatability is where the parapsychology falls down.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |