Warp wrote:

>   Can you name one language which would not benefit from a debugger (which
> you can use, among other things, to insert breakpoints, execute the program
> step-by-step and examine the values of all objects at current scope)?

I know *I* would like it better if Haskell had a quality debugger.

They say if a Haskell program compiles, it usually works correctly. This 
is true, but note that the phrase is "usually".

(There *is* a debug feature in recent versions of GHC, but it doesn't 
seem to work terribly well. And crawling through a complicated piece of 
program using a CLI interface isn't much fun anyway...)

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message