|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>> As I said, the probability of finding a particle in a particular place is
>> based on multiplying complex numbers.
>
> Btw, I find it curious how you use the mathematical models as some kind
> of evidence that photons are not waves.
I believe you misunderstand me. I'm saying we never observe a wave. We just
observe math that's the same math as a wave. That isn't what makes it "not a
wave", that's what makes people used to think (and some people still think)
it was a wave. :-)
I.e., just the opposite. The mathematical model is *not* evidence it's a
wave, any more than the interference patterns are.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |