Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Either *any* interacting causes 
> a state change, in which case the cat *must* be in a known state 
> already, or nothing is, including the poor deluded fool worrying about 
> whether or not he killed the neighbors cat in the experiment, 

Except that's exactly the point. The math says it's the latter case. And the 
cat experiment is to point out how absurd that conclusion is. Hence, the 
math must be mistaken.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message