On 12/02/09 20:09, somebody wrote:
> "Florian Pesth"<fpe### [at] gmxde>  wrote in message
> news:4b16d3e1@news.povray.org...
>
>> So is this an aesthetical question? Because that is the only way this law
>> could be defined in a nondiscriminating way.
>
> It could also be about noise.

	Except then you just need to have simple rules that govern the behavior 
of noise in general. Outlawing an architectural style for noise reasons 
is silly, as you can still create noise without them.

	And for what it's worth, from what I read elsewhere, there wasn't any 
noise of the type you're thinking of from them.

-- 
Even if you win the rat race, you are still a rat.

Post a reply to this message