|
|
> Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> I was under the impression that the colour temperature tells you roughly
>> how the signal power is distributed over the whole spectrum.
>
> Roughly, in that it tells you where the peak is and the general shape of the
> rest of the spectrum.
Sure. So if you know how hot the star is, you know roughly the shape of
the entire emission spectrum. :-)
>> Yeah, both stars and lightbulbs presumably put out far more IR and radio
>> waves than visible light...
>
> Actually, many stars peak in the visible - Betelgeuse is red. Ours is yellow. I
> think maybe lightbulbs peak in the IR (lower temperature), so all we see is a
> section of the tail of the spectrum.
The peak is just the single wavelength at which there is the most
energy. I think if you look at *bands* of the spectrum, it's possible
for a wide band with low energy at any specific single wavelength to
have a greater total power and a band containing only a single
high-power (but narrow) peak.
Post a reply to this message
|
|