Warp wrote:
> It's just a pattern which happens
> to look exactly like an interference pattern, but without being one.

Right!  The math works out to be the same, in some limited cases.

Did you watch the youtube video I linked to? Or are you trying to apply 
common sense to a field which even nobel prize winners in that field agree 
it doesn't make common sense?

>   And if I follow your earlier logic, the pattern looks like an interference
> pattern *because* it's not an interference pattern.

No, you misread that. I said you know it's not an interference pattern 
because it happens with only one photon at a time.

Look, don't argue with me. Argue with Feynman if you want.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message