Bill Pragnell wrote:
> I'd think it was a single shot. I bet you could get away with up to a minute of
> exposure, and it's very wide angle so any movement would be less noticeable.

You can also buy telescope tripods that will use a small motor to turn the 
telescope in counterpoint so the stars appear stationary. I imagine the same 
would work for a camera, and then it would be the ground that's blury.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message