|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Invisible wrote:
> From what I've seen, the W3C standards are _mostly_ reasonable,
It would be mostly reasonable if W3C was actually implementing those things
in their browser. A "mostly reasonable" standard can come out of a throughly
broken standards process, and vice versa.
> the ad-hoc made-up stuff that browser implementors come up with is a
> nightmare.
In part because W3C has a broken standards process that fails to account for
how the world actually works.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
much longer being almost empty than almost full.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |