Invisible wrote:
>  From what I've seen, the W3C standards are _mostly_ reasonable, 

It would be mostly reasonable if W3C was actually implementing those things 
in their browser. A "mostly reasonable" standard can come out of a throughly 
broken standards process, and vice versa.

> the ad-hoc made-up stuff that browser implementors come up with is a 
> nightmare.

In part because W3C has a broken standards process that fails to account for 
how the world actually works.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message