Warp wrote:
> somebody <x### [at] ycom> wrote:
>> In an ideal world, QM should be dead wrong. Unfortunately, it's been
>> verified beyond any reasonable (and unreasonable) doubt.
> 
>   *Part* of it has been verified. As we have seen, it's currently unsuitable
> to explain everything.

What's missing in QM? Or, rather, what has QM predicted that it's unsuitable 
to explain?

That QM doesn't explain relativity doesn't mean QM is wrong. It just means 
it doesn't explain QM, any more than relativity explains nuclear reactions.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Human nature dictates that toothpaste tubes spend
   much longer being almost empty than almost full.

Post a reply to this message