Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> It's not uncommon for a new theory to explain observed phenomina but
> also predict something that nobody has seen before.
Actually that's one of the requisites in order to change a hypothesis into
a theory. (Ok, not a requisite per se, but if it the hypothesis does predict
something and later it results that the prediction was correct, that's a
strong incentive into making the hypothesis a theory.)
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|