Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> It's not uncommon for a new theory to explain observed phenomina but 
> also predict something that nobody has seen before.

  Actually that's one of the requisites in order to change a hypothesis into
a theory. (Ok, not a requisite per se, but if it the hypothesis does predict
something and later it results that the prediction was correct, that's a
strong incentive into making the hypothesis a theory.)

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message