Patrick Elliott wrote:
> Well, then don't. I consider the wording, no matter what it says, to be 
> little more than slight of hand. 

Welcome to the legal system!

> This differs how from say, computing the area of a circle, using the 
> "data" out of the prior step, in which you determined the circumference? 

That's a mathematical formula. Applying that formula in order to calculate 
how far to turn the wheel as you go around a corner in order to reduce the 
wear on tire treads of your car? That's patentable. See the difference?

> some things get *close* to that bad, and everyone knows it.

Now you're arguing something completely different. You're arguing "should" 
instead of "is", so there's no real point in dicussing *that*, you see?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Is God willing to prevent naglams, but unable?
     Then he is not omnipotent.
   Is he able, but not willing, to prevent naglams?
     Then he is malevolent.

Post a reply to this message