Patrick Elliott wrote:
> stop trying to equate the two, there is no point in arguing over why 
> software is the former, and not the later.

You seem to think that I don't understand software is instructions. What 
*you* don't seem to have done is read any patent claims on the matter.

People don't patent software. Until you understand why I say that, you're 
not going to understand what the supreme court case is discussing.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Is God willing to prevent naglams, but unable?
     Then he is not omnipotent.
   Is he able, but not willing, to prevent naglams?
     Then he is malevolent.

Post a reply to this message