|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Neeum Zawan wrote:
>
> That's merely an implementation issue. Their goal is for it even to
> work on console systems (of course, many features just wouldn't work then).
I talked with Bliz about wave in IRC yesterday. I think we came to the
conclusion that if Google releases the protocol as a free one, it might
be pretty good system. Otherwise, if it stays leaning to only Google,
it's not a system I want to use.
> I haven't used it. Hence my saying that _if_ they can deliver what
> they promised...
I've tried, but I haven't been able to actually use it yet :).
> I'm not sure there's a major difference. Put the Wave info on a web
> site (e.g. the POV-Ray web site). Anyone who wants to join simply joins
> it (like a mailing list). The info is all archived on the server. I
> don't know if it can handle moderation, though.
From the moment I tried using it, I actually did have to choose the
recipients. I didn't find a way eg. search for a wave and join in, OTOH
it might be that it doesn't relieve such options for me, after all it
didn't work when I tried it :-).
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |