Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
>>      Is God willing to prevent phrogams, but not able?
>>        Then he is not omnipotent.
>>      Is he able, but not willing, to prevent phrogams?
>>        Then he is malevolent.
> 
>   What is a "phrogam"? The dictionary nor even google seems to know.

Clearly God is willing *and* able to prevent phrogams, then, yes?

>   In any case, I think that's called a false dichotomy.

Clearly, since God actually did prevent phrogams. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
     Is God willing to prevent phrogams, but not able?
       Then he is not omnipotent.
     Is he able, but not willing, to prevent phrogams?
       Then he is malevolent.

Post a reply to this message