>> Trouble is, as I understand it, in the US the winner is always the 
>> side with the most money, regardless of the facts of the issue.
> 
> Well if one side can't afford any lawyers then it might make it tricky, 
> but after that I don't think the money each side has will have much 
> influence.

Seems to me more like a case of "the most expensive lawyer always wins".

> Yeh, I guess if you don't have enough money to pay lawyers and are just 
> relying on one product that *might* infringe on someone elses patent, 
> you're a bit screwed.

Threatening to sue somebody is a good way to make investors go elsewhere.

Post a reply to this message