|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> Trouble is, as I understand it, in the US the winner is always the
>> side with the most money, regardless of the facts of the issue.
>
> Well if one side can't afford any lawyers then it might make it tricky,
> but after that I don't think the money each side has will have much
> influence.
Seems to me more like a case of "the most expensive lawyer always wins".
> Yeh, I guess if you don't have enough money to pay lawyers and are just
> relying on one product that *might* infringe on someone elses patent,
> you're a bit screwed.
Threatening to sue somebody is a good way to make investors go elsewhere.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |