|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Seems like a conceptually simple model.
That was the idea. Sort of like Lambda calculus - very simple, easy to prove
things about with the right formalisms. Then it turned into products.
> I would suggest that sending a channel over a channel is probably
> trivial, but sending a channel over a socket is probably *highly*
> complex...
Could be, could be. But you can conceptually make it work without breaking
the language.
> Well, now I guess I understand why everybody gets so excited about
> Haskell's concurrency support then. :-}
That's part of it.
> It's supposedly one of the big plus points of Java - not that I have
> *ever* seen *any* Java program which actually supports plugins, mind you...
At the time Java did it, it was rather new. Nowadays, Java's mechanisms are
fairly lame compared to the competition.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |